Skip to content
Back to Blog
Ecosystem Updates

RSK Security Audit Results

Read Time: 1 mins
RSK Security Audit Results

As part of our commitment to create the most secure platform, we have conducted two independent external security audits. These have been held by recognized security audit teams: Trail of Bits, and Patrick McCorry and Andrew Miller. Each team was focused on auditing the areas of the code where we believe they could contribute most with their expertise.

Today we are making the final reports available to the public, summarizing the findings and actions RSK team has taken in response. Links to these reports can be found in sections below.

Also, we’d like to remind the community that our vulnerabilities bounty program has already started. The bounty program rewards researchers for reporting not yet identified platform vulnerabilities,

Find below complete security audit reports:

Trail of Bits

Scope of work: smart contract issues related to the virtual machine, virtual machine compatibility with other Ethereum VM implementations, correctness of the Trie data structure, and correctness of the precompiled contracts for the two-way peg.

Link to report: https://github.com/trailofbits/publications/blob/master/reviews/RSKj.pdf

Patrick McCorry and Andrew Miller

Scope of work: first version of the REMASC and Bridge native smart contracts.

Link to report: http://www0.cs.ucl.ac.uk/staff/P.McCorry/rskaudit_ginger_120717.pdf

What’s next

In RSK we believe in defense in depth: that’s why won’t stop at security audits, and we’ll keep thinking how to improve security and adding more security layers in the future.

We are undergoing a third external security audit of the current Bridge contract, while a fourth audit is already planned for the first quarter of 2018. Conducting periodic external security reviews is highly valuable for the development team and the community to continuously validate and improve RSK’s secure development procedures.

We thank security experts Josselin Feist, Evan Sultanik, Patrick McCorry and Andrew Miller for their professional work during the conducted audits.

 

Recommended articles

Rootstock Bridge Security 101: Commonly Asked Questions

Rootstock Bridge Security 101: Commonly Asked Questions

Most losses in Bitcoin-adjacent systems do not start on Bitcoin itself. They start at the edges where the Bitcoin network is exposed to other systems. Whether it’s the bridge that moves BTC onto another network and back again, the vendors who handle customer records, the firmware that is supposed to generate unguessable keys or the […]

Fundamentals
Rootstock x Bitcoin: Merged Mining Insights Report | Q2 2026

Rootstock x Bitcoin: Merged Mining Insights Report | Q2 2026

This report is presented by RootstockLabs, a key contributor to the growth of the Rootstock ecosystem. At Rootstocklabs, we strive to empower the community by offering transparent insights into merged mining dynamics through quarterly hashrate reports dedicated to Rootstock. Our goal is to enhance comprehension with user-friendly visuals such as tables and graphs, ensuring better […]

Ecosystem Updates
Rootstock Roadmap 2026: Building for Bitcoin Capital Markets

Rootstock Roadmap 2026: Building for Bitcoin Capital Markets

2026 has been a defining year for Rootstock. 84% of Bitcoin’s hash rate secures Rootstock via merged mining (Q1 2026) $60M+ in tokenized real-world assets settled on Rootstock (Q2 2026) Four leading institutional custody platforms now support rBTC and Rootstock Vetiver 9.0.0 activated on Mainnet 4 May 2026 Atlas launched 15 April 2026, supporting ~10 […]

Ecosystem Updates